ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

Science Channel

Stale English

ScienceNature & EarthAstronomyGeologySpace Exploration

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

At a glance for parents

Nothing that stood out. This is an AI assessment of the sample, not a safety guarantee.

Age guidance
Older. Read the age guidance and reasoning before choosing for your child.
Concerns found
Horror (Low), Commercial pressure (Low), External contact (Low), Stimulation (Low).
Sample size
10 videos reviewed for age suitability and risk areas; 0 of 100 collected videos screened for harmful or misleading content. See coverage.
Review date
· Stale. Channels can change after a review.
What could not be checked
Spoken content was available for 0 of 10 reviewed videos. The model reads text and still images; it does not watch video or listen to audio. Read this review’s limitations.

How to check a channel before your child watches · Understanding Elsagate screening

Channel analysis summary

The Science Channel provides a mix of educational content focusing on manufacturing processes ('How It's Made'), astronomy, and paranormal investigations ('Strange Evidence'). The content ranges from factual industrial documentaries to speculative explorations of UFOs and unexplained phenomena.

What this channel covers

Covers Space, Building and engineering, Science, History, and Feelings and social skills — mostly by saying how and why things work, or giving practice, rather than only saying what they are.

In the sample we reviewed closely, some topics were explained or practised, not only named. We have not heard the videos to confirm how far that goes.

Space 6 topics · 6 beyond naming
Building and engineering 4 topics · 4 beyond naming
Feelings and social skills 1 topic · 1 beyond naming
History 1 topic
Science 1 topic · 1 beyond naming

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
5,380,000
Subscribers
2,755
Videos published
1,420,949,767
Total views
English
Audio language the uploader declared
Not marked as made for children
Audience the uploader declared

A made-for-children marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child, and nobody checks it against the videos.

What the recent uploads show

Counted from the 100 most recent uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
10
Published in the last 90 days
27/80
Run 180 seconds or less
9:36
Typical length

Uploads marked made for children 0 of the 80 uploads that carry the label.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Consistency High The channel consistently produces content related to science, technology, and mystery, maintaining a professional broadcast quality.
  • Synthetic media None found The content appears to be professionally filmed and edited broadcast media; no obvious signs of generative AI or synthetic narration are present in the metadata or thumbnails.

Does well Strong educational value regarding industrial manufacturing and basic astronomy. Clear categorization of content through series like 'How It's Made'.

This review is stale. A newer analysis is open or did not complete, or the review is older than our freshness target. What follows is the last review that completed successfully.

Age guidance

older

While much of the content is educational and safe, some videos use sensationalist language ('Apocalypse', 'terrifying secrets', 'Underwater GRAVEYARD') and explore paranormal themes that are better suited for older children who can distinguish between scientific fact and speculative entertainment.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Horror

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 80%

    Fear, dread, jump scares, and disturbing imagery.

    Some videos use sensationalist 'spooky' themes, such as 'Underwater GRAVEYARD' and 'Beginning of the Apocalypse', though they are presented in a documentary/investigative style.

    An Underwater GRAVEYARD!? | Strange Evidence | Science Channel Was This the Beginning of the Apocalypse?! | Strange Evidence | Science Channel 2 video(s) cited

  • Commercial pressure

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 80%

    Selling, undisclosed promotion, gambling mechanics, and scams.

    The channel promotes its own streaming service (Discovery+) in descriptions.

    Squishy, Stretchy & Oddly Satisfying 🫟 How It’s Made | Science Channel 1 video(s) cited

  • External contact

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    Links to official social media accounts are provided in the descriptions.

    Squishy, Stretchy & Oddly Satisfying 🫟 How It’s Made | Science Channel Everything About The Sun ☀️ Science Channel 2 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 80%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    Some content is explicitly labeled as 'Oddly Satisfying', which is designed for sensory stimulation.

    Squishy, Stretchy & Oddly Satisfying 🫟 How It’s Made | Science Channel 1 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · violence · mature themes · bullying · adult activities · medical body horror · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

0
Videos screened
0
Flagged
0
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

10 sampled video(s) had no completed screening. Absence of a finding for those is not evidence that there is nothing to find.

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

The videos behind the findings

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review