ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

POYRAZ LEAKS

Full review Turkish English

GamingAnimationsAI CinemaFantasy SeriesBattle Animations

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

At a glance for parents

Read this before showing it. This is an AI assessment of the sample, not a safety guarantee.

Age guidance
Older. Read the age guidance and reasoning before choosing for your child.
Concerns found
Violence (High), Horror (Moderate), Mature themes (Moderate).
Sample size
10 videos reviewed for age suitability and risk areas; 100 of 100 collected videos screened for harmful or misleading content. See coverage.
Review date
· Full review. Channels can change after a review.
What could not be checked
Spoken content was available for 0 of 10 reviewed videos. The model reads text and still images; it does not watch video or listen to audio. Read this review’s limitations.

How to check a channel before your child watches · Understanding Elsagate screening

Channel analysis summary

POYRAZ LEAKS is a channel that posts 'leaks' and spoilers for a series called 'Irklar Arası Savaş' (War Between Races), which appears to be created by another channel, Ismail G. The content consists of short videos featuring stylized, often violent or macabre imagery involving alien-like and humanoid characters.

What this channel covers

We looked across this channel's catalogue and did not find it teaching a school subject.

Says what the videos are about, not how well they teach it. We have not watched or listened to them.

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
6
Subscribers
246
Videos published
1,629
Total views
Turkish, English, UND
Audio language the uploader declared
Not reported
Audience the uploader declared

A made-for-children marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child, and nobody checks it against the videos.

What the recent uploads show

Counted from the 100 most recent uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
15
Published in the last 90 days
89/100
Run 180 seconds or less
1:01
Typical length

Uploads marked made for children 0 of the 100 uploads that carry the label.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Consistency High The channel is very consistent in its theme of posting spoilers for the same series.
  • Synthetic media Moderate The thumbnails appear to be AI-generated or heavily digitally manipulated.

Where the presentation and the content differ

  • In 10 of the 100 videos we screened, the way the video presents itself — its characters, styling, and title — did not match what it appears to contain. Those videos are listed below with the reason recorded for each.

A video made to look like it is for young children, carrying something they are not expecting — the pattern commonly called Elsagate — is the thing this research exists to find. These are automated observations from the images and titles, not a judgement about the channel — read them with the videos they point at.

Age guidance

older

The channel contains frequent depictions of graphic violence, including characters being shot in the head, blood-stained weapons, and imagery of death and captivity, which is unsuitable for younger children.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Violence

    High From thumbnail images Confidence 100%

    Fighting, injury, weapons, and threat.

    Thumbnails explicitly depict gun violence, blood, and weapons.

    gun to head, blood on face, bloody knife, rifle

    Irklar arası savaş 30.Bölüm Spoiler 📣 IRKLAR ARASI SAVAŞ HİKAYESİ #1 📖 @IsmailGOfficial Irklar arası savaş bölüm 21 leak 3 video(s) cited

  • Horror

    Moderate From thumbnail images Confidence 100%

    Fear, dread, jump scares, and disturbing imagery.

    The imagery uses horror tropes such as skeletons, corpses, and dark, oppressive atmospheres.

    skeletons, pale corpse, dark void

    Irklar arası savaş 1.Bölüm Ramek son spoiller 📣 Irklar arası savaş | yeni konuk oyuncular Tanıtıldı 💣 2 video(s) cited

  • Mature themes

    Moderate From titles and descriptions Confidence 100%

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    The content focuses on war, slavery, and death.

    war, slaves, death

    IRKLAR ARASI SAVAŞ PERDE 2 ÖZETİ 📣 1 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · bullying · commercial pressure · external contact · adult activities · medical body horror · stimulation · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
24
Flagged
10
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 24. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

Flagged in screening, outside the sample

Screening flagged these and the sample did not reach them, so no finding above rests on them. They are shown because a flag is worth seeing whether or not the sample happened to include it.

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review