ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

Funny Stop Motion videos

Full review English

SongsAnimalsFunnyAnimationsPretend PlayToy Unboxing

Covers Art and drawing

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

At a glance for parents

Read this before showing it. This is an AI assessment of the sample, not a safety guarantee.

Age guidance
Younger. Read the age guidance and reasoning before choosing for your child.
Concerns found
Violence (Low), Medical body horror (Low), Stimulation (Low).
Sample size
10 videos reviewed for age suitability and risk areas; 100 of 100 collected videos screened for harmful or misleading content. See coverage.
Review date
· Full review. Channels can change after a review.
What could not be checked
Spoken content was available for 0 of 10 reviewed videos. The model reads text and still images; it does not watch video or listen to audio. Read this review’s limitations.

How to check a channel before your child watches · Understanding Elsagate screening

Channel analysis summary

The channel features stop-motion animation using clay and plush-like figures, often depicting popular characters such as Hulk, Elsa, and Paw Patrol. The content primarily consists of simple scenarios, such as playing in sand or 'clay cracking' where figures are dismantled.

What this channel covers

Covers Languages — by showing these things and saying what they are, not how or why they work.

In the sample we reviewed closely, topics were introduced but not explained in any depth. We have not heard the videos either.

Languages 1 topic

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
8,050,000
Subscribers
2,839
Videos published
4,408,329,756
Total views
English
Audio language the uploader declared
Marked as made for children
Audience the uploader declared

A made-for-children marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child, and nobody checks it against the videos.

Categories YouTube lists EntertainmentFilmHobbyLifestyle

What the recent uploads show

Counted from the 100 most recent uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
2
Published in the last 90 days
17/100
Run 180 seconds or less
11:40
Typical length

Uploads marked made for children 100 of the 100 uploads that carry the label.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Consistency High The channel consistently produces stop-motion content using clay and popular characters.
  • Synthetic media None found The content appears to be hand-crafted stop-motion animation rather than AI-generated media.

Does well Use of creative tactile materials like Play-Doh and sand

Where the presentation and the content differ

  • In 31 of the 100 videos we screened, the way the video presents itself — its characters, styling, and title — did not match what it appears to contain. Those videos are listed below with the reason recorded for each.

A video made to look like it is for young children, carrying something they are not expecting — the pattern commonly called Elsagate — is the thing this research exists to find. These are automated observations from the images and titles, not a judgement about the channel — read them with the videos they point at.

Age guidance

younger

The content uses bright colors, child-friendly characters, and simple stop-motion play patterns typical for young children, though some 'clay cracking' videos show the destruction of character faces which may be unsettling to very young toddlers.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Violence

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

    Fighting, injury, weapons, and threat.

    Some videos involve 'cracking' or dismantling clay figures, which is a common ASMR/satisfying video trope rather than interpersonal violence.

    clay cracking, dismantling faces

    cocomelon clay cracking 코코멜론 선생님 애플베리 점토 부수기 Teacher Appleberry cocomelon Daddy clay cracking 2 video(s) cited

  • Medical body horror

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

    Injections, surgery, injury detail, and body distortion.

    The 'clay cracking' of faces and the image of a finger pressing into a clay face may be perceived as mildly unsettling, though it is clearly artistic material.

    finger pressing into clay face, cracking clay heads

    24 de noviembre de 2025 cocomelon clay cracking 코코멜론 선생님 애플베리 점토 부수기 Teacher Appleberry 2 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    The videos use bright colors and stop-motion, but do not exhibit extreme sensory overstimulation.

Nothing found in: language · horror · mature themes · bullying · commercial pressure · external contact · adult activities · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
31
Flagged
31
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 31. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

Flagged in screening, outside the sample

Screening flagged these and the sample did not reach them, so no finding above rests on them. They are shown because a flag is worth seeing whether or not the sample happened to include it.

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review