ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

CrashCourse

Partial review English

ScienceStoriesNature & EarthCurrent AffairsGeology

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Channel analysis summary

CrashCourse provides high-quality, structured educational content across various academic subjects. The sampled videos are part of a comprehensive 'Sex Ed' series, covering biological, social, and medical aspects of human sexuality, reproductive health, and consent using a clinical and inclusive approach.

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
17,100,000
Subscribers
1,700
Videos published
2,273,182,188
Total views

Audience the uploader declared This channel is not marked as made for children. That marking is about advertising and data collection, so its absence says nothing about who the videos are for.

Its 100 most recent uploads

Counted from the uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
7
Published in the last 90 days
0/94
Run 60 seconds or less
10:37
Typical length

Audio language the uploader declared English

Uploads marked made for children 0 of the 94 uploads that carry the label. That marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection, and nobody checks it against the videos.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Educational value High The channel provides structured, cited, and comprehensive information on complex health and social topics.
  • Consistency High The videos follow a consistent series format (Sex Ed #X) with similar structures, including introductions, themed segments, and credits.
  • Synthetic media None found No evidence of machine-generated content; videos feature a human host and custom graphics.

Does well Strong commitment to evidence-based information, citing reputable sources like the Kinsey Institute, Planned Parenthood, and the Cleveland Clinic. Inclusive and non-judgmental tone when discussing sensitive social and biological topics.

This is a preliminary review. Some of what we wanted to examine was out of reach when this analysis ran, so it rests on less evidence than a full review. What is published below is accurate as far as it goes; the limitations section says what it could not cover.

Where the presentation and the content differ

  • In 3 of the 100 videos we screened, the way the video presents itself — its characters, styling, and title — did not match what it appears to contain. Those videos are listed below with the reason recorded for each.

A video made to look like it is for young children, carrying something they are not expecting, is the thing this research exists to find. These are automated observations from the images and titles, not a judgement about the channel — read them with the videos they point at.

  • What is kink?: Sex Ed #15 presentation mismatch

    Mismatch: Adult sexual content (kinks, fetishes, BDSM) appearing on a channel that promotes 'CC Kids' in the description.

  • Unpacking masturbation: Sex Ed #14 presentation mismatch

    Mismatch: Adult sexual content (masturbation) appearing on a channel that promotes 'CC Kids' in the description.

  • What to know about orgasms: Sex Ed #13 presentation mismatch

    Mismatch: Adult sexual content (orgasms) appearing on a channel that promotes 'CC Kids' in the description.

Age guidance

older

The content deals explicitly with mature topics including sexual activity, masturbation, pornography, abortion, and STIs. While presented educationally, these subjects are intended for adolescents and adults.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Mature themes

    High From titles and descriptions Confidence 100%

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    The content explicitly focuses on sexual health, including kinks, masturbation, orgasms, pornography, abortion, and STIs.

    What is kink?: Sex Ed #15 Unpacking masturbation: Sex Ed #14 What to know about orgasms: Sex Ed #13 10 video(s) cited

  • Adult activities

    High From titles and descriptions Confidence 100%

    Alcohol, drugs, tobacco, gambling, and driving.

    The series is dedicated to sex education, discussing sexual acts, pleasure, and reproductive health.

    What is kink?: Sex Ed #15 Unpacking masturbation: Sex Ed #14 What to know about orgasms: Sex Ed #13 4 video(s) cited

  • Commercial pressure

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Selling, undisclosed promotion, gambling mechanics, and scams.

    The channel mentions Patreon and direct support to keep content free, but does not use aggressive sales tactics.

    What is kink?: Sex Ed #15 Unpacking masturbation: Sex Ed #14 2 video(s) cited

  • External contact

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    Links to social media and educational resources are provided in the descriptions.

    What is kink?: Sex Ed #15 1 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · violence · horror · bullying · medical body horror · stimulation · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
18
Flagged
3
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • The sample consists entirely of the 'Sex Ed' series, which does not represent the channel's other 60+ courses in humanities and sciences.
  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 18. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

Flagged in screening, outside the sample

Screening flagged these and the sample did not reach them, so no finding above rests on them. They are shown because a flag is worth seeing whether or not the sample happened to include it.

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review