ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

I BROKE MY WRIST

outlier flagged in screening in the analyzed sample

Published

Watch this video on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

We do not host or play video. This link leaves our site.

Is this video typical of the channel?

This video stood out from the rest of the sample. Treat it as an exception worth looking at rather than as a description of the channel.

Findings that cite this video

  • Language

    None found

    Swearing, insults, and crude language.

    No profanity or offensive language was observed in the titles or descriptions.

    Confidence 90%

  • Adult activities

    None found

    Alcohol, drugs, tobacco, gambling, and driving.

    No adult activities are depicted in the visual or text data.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

  • Medical body horror

    None found

    Injections, surgery, injury detail, and body distortion.

    While a broken wrist and cast are shown, they are presented as a personal injury/vlog context, not as body horror.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

  • Stimulation

    Low

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    Content consists of standard gaming footage and short-form clips without excessive sensory stimulation.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

  • Synthetic media

    None found

    How much of this appears machine-generated rather than filmed or drawn by a person. Not a risk on its own, but AI-generated channels can publish at a volume no one is reviewing.

    The content appears to be a mix of recorded gameplay and filmed real-life footage.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

Screening note

Medical/injury theme ('I BROKE MY WRIST') combined with a bizarre, potentially fetishistic or shock-oriented scenario involving a cast and a marker, fitting the pattern of Elsagate-style medical/body-horror mismatches.

About this evidence

Screening
Complete

Title, thumbnail, and publication date come from YouTube. The findings are our conclusions. How we do this.

Think this is wrong?

Contact us about this video