ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

NASA Astronaut Anil Menon Soyuz MS-29 Launch

typical in the analyzed sample

Published

Watch this video on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

We do not host or play video. This link leaves our site.

Is this video typical of the channel?

This video looked representative of the rest of the sample — nothing set it apart from its neighbours.

Findings that cite this video

  • Language

    None found

    Swearing, insults, and crude language.

    No profanity or inappropriate language is present in the metadata.

    Confidence 90%

  • Violence

    None found

    Fighting, injury, weapons, and threat.

    No violence is depicted; rocket launches are presented as scientific achievements.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

  • Horror

    None found

    Fear, dread, jump scares, and disturbing imagery.

    No horror elements are present.

    Confidence 90%

  • Mature themes

    None found

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    Content is strictly professional and scientific.

    Confidence 90%

  • Bullying

    None found

    Mockery, exclusion, humiliation, and cruelty.

    No bullying or harassment is present.

    Confidence 90%

  • Commercial pressure

    None found

    Selling, undisclosed promotion, gambling mechanics, and scams.

    No products are being sold; the channel provides public information.

    Confidence 90%

  • External contact

    None found

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    Links provided lead to official nasa.gov informational pages.

    Confidence 90%

  • Adult activities

    None found

    Alcohol, drugs, tobacco, gambling, and driving.

    No adult activities are depicted.

    Confidence 90%

  • Medical body horror

    None found

    Injections, surgery, injury detail, and body distortion.

    No medical body horror is present.

    Confidence 90%

  • Stimulation

    Low

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    Some videos contain high-energy launch footage, but the overall tone is measured and informative.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

  • Educational value

    High

    Whether the channel teaches something. Descriptive, not a risk — a high level here is positive.

    The channel provides direct information on space missions, astronaut roles, and lunar exploration goals.

    Confidence 90%

  • Consistency

    High

    How alike the sampled videos are. Descriptive, not a risk — high means the sample predicts the rest of the channel well.

    The content consistently adheres to NASA's mission of scientific discovery and space exploration.

    Confidence 90%

  • Impersonation

    None found

    Presents itself as a channel, brand, or creator it is not. A copy of a well-known name is often a different operator entirely, so the reputation a parent is relying on does not apply.

    The channel is the official NASA account with a massive subscriber base and official branding.

    Confidence 90%

  • Synthetic media

    None found

    How much of this appears machine-generated rather than filmed or drawn by a person. Not a risk on its own, but AI-generated channels can publish at a volume no one is reviewing.

    Content appears to be real footage of launches, news conferences, and astronaut portraits.

    From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

Screening note

Official NASA content regarding spacecraft launch.

About this evidence

Screening
Complete

Title, thumbnail, and publication date come from YouTube. The findings are our conclusions. How we do this.

Think this is wrong?

Contact us about this video