ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

Like Nastya

Partial review English

SongsAnimalsNumbers & MathScienceStoriesFunnyAnimationsChallengesVlogsCookingPreschool LearningNature & Earth

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Channel analysis summary

Like Nastya is a high-production children's entertainment channel featuring a young girl and her family. The content primarily consists of imaginative roleplay, toy demonstrations, and themed challenges. Common motifs include 'rich vs poor' scenarios used to illustrate social lessons and high-energy activities in child-friendly environments.

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
133,000,000
Subscribers
1,093
Videos published
122,299,027,457
Total views

Audience the uploader declared This channel is marked as made for children. That marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — it is not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child.

Its 100 most recent uploads

Counted from the uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
19
Published in the last 90 days
33/95
Run 60 seconds or less
18:07
Typical length

Audio language the uploader declared English

Uploads marked made for children 95 of the 95 uploads that carry the label. That marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection, and nobody checks it against the videos.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Educational value Low The channel aims to teach social-emotional skills like sharing and empathy through roleplay.
  • Consistency High The channel consistently produces high-production-value roleplay and play-based content for children.
  • Synthetic media Low Some thumbnails appear to use digital manipulation or compositing (e.g., the lion in a room).

Does well Emphasis on pro-social behaviors such as sharing and friendship in video descriptions.

This is a preliminary review. Some of what we wanted to examine was out of reach when this analysis ran, so it rests on less evidence than a full review. What is published below is accurate as far as it goes; the limitations section says what it could not cover.

What YouTube's own labels say

The uploader has marked 9 of the 10 videos we looked at as made for children. Our review of those same videos found commercial pressure, stimulation worth a parent's attention. That marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — it is not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child.

Nobody checks that marking against the videos.

Where the presentation and the content differ

  • In 1 of the 100 videos we screened, the way the video presents itself — its characters, styling, and title — did not match what it appears to contain. Those videos are listed below with the reason recorded for each.

A video made to look like it is for young children, carrying something they are not expecting, is the thing this research exists to find. These are automated observations from the images and titles, not a judgement about the channel — read them with the videos they point at.

  • Nastya and Rich vs Poor Hospital presentation mismatch

    Mismatch: 'Hospital' theme combined with a giant 'PILL' prop and 'Rich vs Poor' social commentary, which are common tropes in Elsagate-style content.

Age guidance

younger

The content focuses on imaginative play, toy reviews, and basic social lessons (sharing, friendship) tailored for young children. While some themes involve 'rich vs poor' contrasts, the presentation is stylized and child-centric.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Commercial pressure

    Moderate From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Selling, undisclosed promotion, gambling mechanics, and scams.

    Videos feature specific branded toys (e.g., LPS Spring Faves) and include affiliate or promotional links in descriptions.

    Nastya and her friends are learning to share LPS Spring Faves toys 1 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    Moderate From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    High-contrast thumbnails, bright colors, and exaggerated facial expressions are used to attract children's attention.

    Nastya and Evelyn - Culinary Competition Nastya and Friends are Superheroes 2 video(s) cited

  • Violence

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 100%

    Fighting, injury, weapons, and threat.

    Contains mild, playful physical activity such as children playing with foam pillows in a trampoline park.

    Nastya and Evelyn at the Urban Air entertainment park 1 video(s) cited

  • Horror

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

    Fear, dread, jump scares, and disturbing imagery.

    Includes mild Halloween-themed imagery such as plastic spiders and slime.

    Nastya and Friends - Mysterious Challenge in the house 1 video(s) cited

  • Mature themes

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 80%

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    The channel uses 'Rich vs Poor' narratives to frame social lessons about sharing and status.

    Nastya and Rich vs Poor Hospital Nastya and Poor Princess vs. Rich Princess story 2 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · bullying · external contact · adult activities · medical body horror · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
1
Flagged
1
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 1. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

The rest of the sample

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review