ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

ismail G

Full review Turkish

GamingAnimationsAI CinemaSci-Fi ActionFantasy Series

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

At a glance for parents

Read this before showing it. This is an AI assessment of the sample, not a safety guarantee.

Age guidance
Older. Read the age guidance and reasoning before choosing for your child.
Concerns found
Violence (Moderate), Horror (Low), Mature themes (Low), External contact (Low), Stimulation (Low).
Sample size
10 videos reviewed for age suitability and risk areas; 100 of 100 collected videos screened for harmful or misleading content. See coverage.
Review date
· Full review. Channels can change after a review.
What could not be checked
Spoken content was available for 0 of 10 reviewed videos. The model reads text and still images; it does not watch video or listen to audio. Read this review’s limitations.

How to check a channel before your child watches · Understanding Elsagate screening

Channel analysis summary

The channel features a series of animations titled 'Irklar Arası Savaş' (Interracial War), created using CapCut and Stumble Guys models. The content focuses on a fictional, dramatic narrative involving conflict, character development, and action, often presented as a serialized story with specific age warnings provided by the creator.

What this channel covers

We looked across this channel's catalogue and did not find it teaching a school subject.

Says what the videos are about, not how well they teach it. We have not watched or listened to them.

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
2,490
Subscribers
1,195
Videos published
1,162,163
Total views
Turkish, English
Audio language the uploader declared
Not reported
Audience the uploader declared

A made-for-children marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child, and nobody checks it against the videos.

Categories YouTube lists EntertainmentFilm

What the recent uploads show

Counted from the 100 most recent uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
10
Published in the last 90 days
57/100
Run 180 seconds or less
2:10
Typical length

Uploads marked made for children 0 of the 100 uploads that carry the label.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Consistency High The channel consistently follows a theme of serialized animation with a recurring set of characters and a standardized description format.
  • Synthetic media Moderate The creator explicitly mentions using 'text-to-speech' (yazıdan seslendirme) and CapCut animation tools.

Does well Creator provides clear age guidelines and content warnings in descriptions Detailed credits for collaborators and tools used

Where the presentation and the content differ

  • In 57 of the 100 videos we screened, the way the video presents itself — its characters, styling, and title — did not match what it appears to contain. Those videos are listed below with the reason recorded for each.

A video made to look like it is for young children, carrying something they are not expecting — the pattern commonly called Elsagate — is the thing this research exists to find. These are automated observations from the images and titles, not a judgement about the channel — read them with the videos they point at.

Age guidance

older

The creator explicitly labels the main series as 14+ due to themes of violence, horror, drama, and tension. The thumbnails and descriptions reference 'wars', 'hell', and 'revenge', which are more suitable for an older child or teenager.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Violence

    Moderate Confidence 90%

    Fighting, injury, weapons, and threat.

    The channel's main series is titled 'Interracial War' and descriptions explicitly mention violence and intense action.

    war, revenge, intense action

    Irklar arası savaş 28 Irklar arası savaş 27 2 video(s) cited

  • Horror

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

    Fear, dread, jump scares, and disturbing imagery.

    Descriptions mention horror elements, and some thumbnails use dark, eerie imagery (bats, spiderwebs, hell).

    hell, bats, spiderwebs

    Yeni Evren: Cehennem Bekçisi — Irklar Arası Savaş Elif’in Hikayesi 01 – Kim Bu Karakterler? 2 video(s) cited

  • Mature themes

    Low Confidence 80%

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    The content deals with dramatic themes such as betrayal, difficult choices, and revenge.

    revenge, dramatic choices

    Irklar arası savaş 28 1 video(s) cited

  • External contact

    Low Confidence 90%

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    The creator provides a business email and links to a Bluesky profile for contact.

    email, Bluesky link

    Irklar arası savaş 28 1 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 70%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    Some thumbnails use high-contrast colors and fire effects, but there is no evidence of hyper-stimulating editing patterns.

    fire effects, high contrast

    Irklar arası savaş - sezon 5'te hesap vakti 1 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · bullying · commercial pressure · adult activities · medical body horror · impersonation

Notable and unrepresentative videos

These stood out from the rest of the sample.

  • ySLNF3EvoCg
  • _-jeFYQTHDo

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
66
Flagged
57
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 66. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

Flagged in screening, outside the sample

Screening flagged these and the sample did not reach them, so no finding above rests on them. They are shown because a flag is worth seeing whether or not the sample happened to include it.

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review