Wilbur
Partial review English
SongsScienceFunnyGamingVlogs
ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.
Channel analysis summary
The channel features a variety of content from a single creator, including long-form live streams, music covers, social experiments (such as visiting psychics), and travel vlogs. The tone is often irreverent and eclectic, blending personal anecdotes with curiosity-driven projects.
What YouTube reports
YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.
- Channel created
- 601,000
- Subscribers
- 20
- Videos published
- 7,931,583
- Total views
Audience the uploader declared This channel is not marked as made for children. That marking is about advertising and data collection, so its absence says nothing about who the videos are for.
Its 21 most recent uploads
Counted from the uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 21.
- Most recent upload
- 6
- Published in the last 90 days
- 1/20
- Run 60 seconds or less
- 26:52
- Typical length
Audio language the uploader declared English
Uploads marked made for children 0 of the 21 uploads that carry the label. That marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection, and nobody checks it against the videos.
About the channel
What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.
- Educational value Low Some videos aim to explain how psychics use vague expressions or provide history lessons, though the primary intent is entertainment.
- Consistency Moderate The channel is consistent in its persona and aesthetic, though the video formats vary from music to vlogs to streams.
- Synthetic media None found The content appears to be filmed by a person; no evidence of machine-generated imagery or narration was found.
Does well Engagement with charitable causes, such as environmental cleanup for Calvert Island. Educational curiosity, such as debunking psychic techniques and discussing history.
This is a preliminary review. Some of what we wanted to examine was out of reach when this analysis ran, so it rests on less evidence than a full review. What is published below is accurate as far as it goes; the limitations section says what it could not cover.
Age guidance
older
The content contains references to alcohol consumption ('im a little drunk'), nicotine use ('vapes', 'cigarette'), and strong language ('fucking kids'), making it more suitable for an older adolescent or adult audience.
Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.
What we found
11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.
-
Language
ModerateSwearing, insults, and crude language.
The use of strong profanity is present in the video thumbnails and metadata.
1 video(s) cited
-
Adult activities
ModerateAlcohol, drugs, tobacco, gambling, and driving.
The creator explicitly mentions being drunk and references vaping and smoking cigarettes in the descriptions.
2 video(s) cited
-
Mature themes
LowSexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.
References to alcohol and nicotine are present, but not depicted as graphic or promotional.
2 video(s) cited
-
External contact
LowPushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.
The creator provides links to Instagram, Reddit, and Twitter for viewers to follow.
3 video(s) cited
-
Stimulation
LowPace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.
The content consists mostly of talking-head videos and music, with low sensory stimulation.
2 video(s) cited
Nothing found in: violence · horror · bullying · commercial pressure · medical body horror · impersonation
What this review covers
Harmful or misleading content · every video
- 21
- Videos screened
- 4
- Flagged
- 0
- Of those, presentation mismatches
Age suitability and risk areas · a sample
- 10
- Videos reviewed
- 0
- Spoken content examined
What this review could not see
- We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.
The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.
What we looked at
Automated screening checked all 21 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 4. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.
Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work
Stood out from the sample
-
i'll try to make this quick.
Flagged ·
Description explicitly mentions being drunk.
-
why i started looksmaxxing at 49 years old
Flagged ·
Description references vapes and cigarettes.
-
Let's chat
Flagged ·
Visuals show consumption of alcohol.
-
Karen, please come back I miss the kids
Flagged ·
Contains profanity in subtitles and adult-themed comedic distress; inappropriate for a curated kids' app.
The rest of the sample
Think this review is wrong?
If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.