ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

Wilbur

Full review English

SongsScienceFunnyGamingVlogs

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

At a glance for parents

Worth a look first. This is an AI assessment of the sample, not a safety guarantee.

Age guidance
Older. Read the age guidance and reasoning before choosing for your child.
Concerns found
Language (Moderate), Mature themes (Moderate), External contact (Low), Adult activities (Moderate), Stimulation (Low).
Sample size
10 videos reviewed for age suitability and risk areas; 21 of 21 collected videos screened for harmful or misleading content. See coverage.
Review date
· Full review. Channels can change after a review.
What could not be checked
Spoken content was available for 0 of 10 reviewed videos. The model reads text and still images; it does not watch video or listen to audio. Read this review’s limitations.

How to check a channel before your child watches · Understanding Elsagate screening

Channel analysis summary

The channel features a variety of content including long-form casual streams, geography-focused videos, and musical covers. The tone is often eccentric and informal, with some videos utilizing provocative titles and thumbnails for comedic or stylistic effect.

What this channel covers

Covers Geography — mostly by saying how and why things work, or giving practice, rather than only saying what they are.

In the sample we reviewed closely, topics were introduced but not explained in any depth. We have not heard the videos either.

Geography 2 topics · 2 beyond naming

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
599,000
Subscribers
23
Videos published
8,220,485
Total views
English
Audio language the uploader declared
Not marked as made for children
Audience the uploader declared

A made-for-children marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child, and nobody checks it against the videos.

What the recent uploads show

Counted from the 21 most recent uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 21.

Most recent upload
3
Published in the last 90 days
1/20
Run 180 seconds or less
26:52
Typical length

Uploads marked made for children 0 of the 21 uploads that carry the label.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Consistency Moderate The channel maintains a consistent personal brand and aesthetic across various content types.

Does well Interest in geography and cartography Musical performance and skill development

Age guidance

older

The content contains adult language (profanity in thumbnails), references to alcohol and nicotine use in descriptions, and a general tone aimed at an older, internet-savvy audience.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

5 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Language

    Moderate From thumbnail images Confidence 100%

    Swearing, insults, and crude language.

    The channel uses profanity in video thumbnails.

    fucking

    Karen, please come back I miss the kids 1 video(s) cited

  • Mature themes

    Moderate Confidence 100%

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    Descriptions explicitly mention alcohol consumption and nicotine products.

    drunk, vapes, cigarette, pint

    i'll try to make this quick. why i started looksmaxxing at 49 years old 2 video(s) cited

  • Adult activities

    Moderate Confidence 100%

    Alcohol, drugs, tobacco, gambling, and driving.

    The creator mentions being drunk and using nicotine in the video descriptions.

    drunk, vapes, cigarette

    i'll try to make this quick. why i started looksmaxxing at 49 years old 2 video(s) cited

  • External contact

    Low Confidence 100%

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    The channel provides links to external social media platforms and a charity fundraiser.

    Instagram, Reddit, Twitter, GoFundMe

    Let's chat Karen, please come back I miss the kids wilbur - 3rd Planet (Modest Mouse cover) 3 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 80%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    Some thumbnails use high-contrast colors and exaggerated facial expressions to attract attention.

    exaggerated faces, bright red text

    Karen, please come back I miss the kids Why the most northern point in Europe is a lie 2 video(s) cited

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

21
Videos screened
4
Flagged
0
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 21 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 4. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

The rest of the sample

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review