ScreenMyYouTuber AI analysis of what YouTube channels actually publish

Collins Key

Full review English

FunnyGamingAnimationsChallengesCookingPretend Play

ScreenMyYouTuber — analysis performed by AI, published by us.

Open this channel on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

At a glance for parents

Read this before showing it. This is an AI assessment of the sample, not a safety guarantee.

Age guidance
Older. Read the age guidance and reasoning before choosing for your child.
Concerns found
Violence (Low), Horror (Low), Mature themes (Low), Bullying (Low), Commercial pressure (High), External contact (Moderate), Stimulation (High).
Sample size
10 videos reviewed for age suitability and risk areas; 100 of 100 collected videos screened for harmful or misleading content. See coverage.
Review date
· Full review. Channels can change after a review.
What could not be checked
Spoken content was available for 0 of 10 reviewed videos. The model reads text and still images; it does not watch video or listen to audio. Read this review’s limitations.

How to check a channel before your child watches · Understanding Elsagate screening

Channel analysis summary

Collins Key produces high-energy, challenge-based entertainment featuring DIY projects, pranks, and 'real vs fake' food comparisons. The content is characterized by exaggerated thumbnails, competitive games with cash prizes, and a focus on viral trends like slime and fidget spinners.

What this channel covers

We looked across this channel's catalogue and did not find it teaching a school subject.

In the sample we reviewed closely, topics were introduced but not explained in any depth. We have not heard the videos either.

What YouTube reports

YouTube's own figures for this channel, as collected when we looked. Nothing here is a finding of ours.

Channel created
23,700,000
Subscribers
260
Videos published
7,024,790,950
Total views
English
Audio language the uploader declared
Not marked as made for children
Audience the uploader declared

A made-for-children marking is the uploader's own answer to a question about advertising and data collection — not a judgement by anyone that the content suits a child, and nobody checks it against the videos.

What the recent uploads show

Counted from the 100 most recent uploads we fetched when we looked. Where YouTube does not report a figure for a video, that video is left out of the count rather than assumed — so some totals below are smaller than 100.

Most recent upload
0
Published in the last 90 days
7/100
Run 180 seconds or less
16:56
Typical length

Uploads marked made for children 2 of the 100 uploads that carry the label.

About the channel

What kind of channel this is. These describe it rather than warn about it, so they carry no severity colour.

  • Consistency High The channel is very consistent in its format: high-energy challenges, DIY food/slime, and prank wars.
  • Synthetic media None found No obvious signs of machine-generated content; videos appear to be filmed live-action.

Does well Includes a disclaimer and a link to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in a video themed around kidnapping.

Where the presentation and the content differ

  • In 6 of the 100 videos we screened, the way the video presents itself — its characters, styling, and title — did not match what it appears to contain. Those videos are listed below with the reason recorded for each.

A video made to look like it is for young children, carrying something they are not expecting — the pattern commonly called Elsagate — is the thing this research exists to find. These are automated observations from the images and titles, not a judgement about the channel — read them with the videos they point at.

Age guidance

older

While the themes are generally child-friendly, the channel features simulated kidnapping scenarios, 'extreme' challenges involving fire and ice, and strong commercial pressure through merchandise and sponsorships. The high-stimulation editing and prank-heavy nature are better suited for older children who can distinguish between staged entertainment and real-life safety.

Age guidance is our reading of the sample, not a rating and not a certification.

What we found

11 of 11 risk areas were assessed, worst first. A finding is an observation with evidence behind it, not an accusation.

  • Commercial pressure

    High From titles and descriptions Confidence 100%

    Selling, undisclosed promotion, gambling mechanics, and scams.

    Frequent promotion of official merchandise, sponsored content (Invisalign, Elmer's), and links to Target, Walmart, and Amazon.

    merch links, sponsored by Invisalign, Elmer's #ad

    Hamster Maze vs Human Traps 🐹 World’s Most Extreme Elimination Game! Last To Survive Minecraft Wins Extreme 140ft Bungee Jump VS Crazy Slime Making! First To Hit Target Wins Challenge! Whatever You Draw, I’ll Buy It PANCAKE ART CHALLENGE & How To Make Lion King Visa Art 3 video(s) cited

  • Stimulation

    High From thumbnail images Confidence 90%

    Pace, loudness, and sensory intensity. High is not unsafe, but it is worth knowing before bedtime viewing.

    Thumbnails use extreme colors, shocked facial expressions, and high-contrast imagery to attract attention.

    shocked faces, bright colors, extreme thumbnails

    Hamster Maze vs Human Traps 🐹 World’s Most Extreme Elimination Game! Last To Survive Minecraft Wins Extreme Hot vs Cold Hide and Seek Challenge! Last Girl To Survive Fire & Icy Pool for 24 Hours Wins 10 Funny Pranks + 24 Hour Prank Wars!!! How To Do Insane Pool Pranks VS The Best Candy Challenge 3 video(s) cited

  • External contact

    Moderate From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Pushes viewers to chat, message, or meet somewhere off-platform.

    The descriptions heavily encourage viewers to follow the creators on multiple social media platforms and join a 'Keyper Club'.

    Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok links

    Escape A Kidnapper, Win $10,000! How To Survive vs 100 Kidnappers & Extreme Mystery Traps DIY Candy Fidget Spinners YOU CAN EAT!!!!!!! Rare Edible Fidget Spinner & Tricks 2 video(s) cited

  • Violence

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 90%

    Fighting, injury, weapons, and threat.

    The channel uses themes of kidnapping and 'surviving' traps, but these are presented as games among friends.

    kidnapper, traps, survive

    Escape A Kidnapper, Win $10,000! How To Survive vs 100 Kidnappers & Extreme Mystery Traps 1 video(s) cited

  • Horror

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 80%

    Fear, dread, jump scares, and disturbing imagery.

    Some videos mention 'zombie jump scares' or 'haunted' themes as part of pranks.

    zombie jump scare, haunted secret passageways

    10 Funny Pranks + Prank Wars!!! *24 Hours Challenge* How To Do Insane DIY Tik Tok Pranks Inside Extreme Hot vs Cold Hide and Seek Challenge! Last Girl To Survive Fire & Icy Pool for 24 Hours Wins 2 video(s) cited

  • Mature themes

    Low From thumbnail images Confidence 70%

    Sexual, romantic, or otherwise adult subject matter.

    One thumbnail depicts a fake pregnancy belly used as a prank to hide candy.

    fake pregnancy baby bump

    15 Weird Ways To Sneak Candy Into the Movies & How To Not Get Caught! Last To Drop Food Wins 1 video(s) cited

  • Bullying

    Low From titles and descriptions Confidence 80%

    Mockery, exclusion, humiliation, and cruelty.

    The channel focuses heavily on pranks, which can border on bullying, though they are framed as 'funny' and between friends.

    prank wars, prank your friends

    10 Funny Pranks + 24 Hour Prank Wars!!! How To Do Insane Pool Pranks VS The Best Candy Challenge 10 Funny Pranks + Prank Wars!!! *24 Hours Challenge* How To Do Insane DIY Tik Tok Pranks Inside 2 video(s) cited

Nothing found in: language · adult activities · medical body horror · impersonation

What this review covers

Harmful or misleading content · every video

100
Videos screened
6
Flagged
6
Of those, presentation mismatches

Age suitability and risk areas · a sample

10
Videos reviewed
0
Spoken content examined

What this review could not see

  • We could not access what is said in 10 of 10 videos we looked at; findings for those rest on titles, descriptions, and thumbnail images.

The model reads text and still images. It does not watch video or listen to audio. Full methodology.

What we looked at

Automated screening checked all 100 of this channel's videos for harmful content and for videos presenting themselves as something they are not, and flagged 6. The age band and risk areas above are a separate reading of 10 of those videos. We do not have what is said in any of those, so every finding rests on how a video presents itself rather than on what it contains.

Flag reasons are AI observations, published as produced — read them alongside the video, not instead of it. How screening and sampling work

Stood out from the sample

The rest of the sample

Think this review is wrong?

If you represent this channel and believe our analysis is inaccurate, contact us and we will re-examine it. A review can be withdrawn from publication immediately on request while that happens.

Contact us about this review